Path: news.mitre.org!blanket.mitre.org!nntprelay.mathworks.com!newsfeed.internetmci.com!192.220.251.22!netnews.nwnet.net!news.microsoft.com!news From: "Paul Sanders" Newsgroups: comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.nt.kernel-mode Subject: Re: Why Completion routine...? Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 07:20:44 -0800 Organization: Microsoft Lines: 22 Message-ID: <6aku1j$mr2@news.microsoft.com> References: <6aksdh$a60$1@tom.pppl.gov> NNTP-Posting-Host: 157.54.178.80 X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3 Because SVR.Sys hard codes the number of stack locations. You can up what server uses by tweaking the registry. I cannot remember exactly where, so you need to query the Resource kit. Maybe someone else will know the exact registry location and post it. -Paul Iliia wrote in message <6aksdh$a60$1@tom.pppl.gov>... >I have a filter driver like OSR's Filemon. All was OK until I've decided to >try working without completion routine. All it does is >f( Irp->PendingReturned ) IoMarkIrpPending( Irp ); actually. Immediately >I've started to bugcheck with NO_MORE_STACK_LOCATIONS when copying files >from another computer i.e. starting from another computer to get files from >my. >Anybody got an idea why should it be? >-- >Iliia Dubrovsky. >ILIIA_DUBROVSKY@MAIL.STIL.SCITEX.COM > > >