Path: news.mitre.org!blanket.mitre.org!agate!newsgate.duke.edu!nntprelay.mathworks.com!cam-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!news-feed1.tiac.net!news-master.tiac.net!news From: kender@www.hollyfeld.org (Daniel Garcia) Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy,comp.sys.intel,comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.nt.kernel-mode,comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy Subject: Re: Filesystems (Re: Illegal Instruction Information (Was This code will ...)) Date: 16 Nov 1997 13:50:31 -0500 Organization: Hollyfeld Information Systems Lines: 30 Message-ID: <64nf9n$44d@www.hollyfeld.org> References: <6418po$8ph$1@brie.direct.ca> <346f38e1.3795968@news.uq.edu.au> <346E5EC0.68CD800D@uniserve.com> <3475862e.3521032@news.uq.edu.au> NNTP-Posting-Host: www.hollyfeld.org Xref: news.mitre.org comp.os.linux.advocacy:132318 comp.sys.intel:142212 comp.os.ms-windows.programmer.nt.kernel-mode:5152 comp.os.ms-windows.nt.advocacy:75466 Slaving away in a dark room, jw@qits.net.au.nospam (John Wiltshire) produced: >Your Linux filesystem is still not fault tolerant. My NT filesystem >is. No - it isn't. I have, at times, taken an NT machine down hard enough that the NTFS file system was corrupted beyond repair, and needed to to be restored from backup. In 4 years of running linux I have _never_ had a crash take out my filesystem. And this is in a house where cats quite regularly kick the power button on the UPS, or the machine itself. Someone else here pointed out that NTFS only journals meta-data about files, not the actual file data. Since I don't have need of a journaled file system, I really don't care if NT's is half implemented, or if linux's is still in the alpha stage. However, ext2fs has time and again proved itself more reliable _to_me_ in my environment - that my primary mail/web/ftp server is a linux box, not an NT box. (I won't even touch performance issues and the like) >>Also, the notorious 4 lines C program locks up NT on Pentium-66 >>instantly. Thanks Microsoft for not making NT a multiuser system >>because nobody can login into my workstation and crash it >>remotely. >:-) Curious little benefit in a way? About the only benefit i've seen to not having a multi-user system. Cheers, --Dg