INFO-VAX	Thu, 27 Sep 2007	Volume 2007 : Issue 527

   Contents:
Re: ba356 box
Re: ba356 box
Re: ba356 box
Re: despair
Serious Advertising for Serious Marketers
Re: Soymail not working with WASD
username/nocom vs. sylogin
Re: username/nocom vs. sylogin
Re: Web-based VMS Que Monitor for Deathrow
Re: Web-based VMS Que Monitor for Deathrow
Re: Web-based VMS Que Monitor for Deathrow
Re: Web-based VMS Que Monitor for Deathrow

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 14:06:14 -0400
From: "Richard B. Gilbert" <rgilbert88@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: ba356 box
Message-ID: <46FA9F96.4030108@comcast.net>

Carl Friedberg wrote:
> It's been awhile, but IIRC, the BA356 is capable of operating in a split
> bus mode, so that there are two independent SCSI buses. Assuming
> two power supplies, that allows you to connect to two channels on a
> SWXCR.
> 

AFAIK two power supplies are not a requirement for split bus operation. 
  They are a very good thing to have however; those power supplies have 
been known to fail and it's nice to be able to swap out the bad supply 
without having your management know there was a problem (unless you 
choose to tell them).

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:58:59 -0400
From: "Carl Friedberg" <frida.fried@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: ba356 box
Message-ID: <890539d90709261258q34fd986dofa733c6a2786b34@mail.gmail.com>

Richard,

You are quite correct, the flaw was in my message. I did not
mean to imply that there was a requirement for dual power
supplies, in order to split the bus. To split the bus, you
need the BA356 manual, which IIRC shows how to flip
over a couple of connectors on the BA356 backplane; then
I believe the two SCSI connectors on the DWZZI?? will feed
each half-bus separately. I know I've done it, but this was
more than 10 years ago, so I don't trust my recollection.

I've never had a BA356 with only one power supply installed.
I have had a BA356 with only one power supply working,
and I never noticed that the other supply had died... doh...

Carl

On 9/26/07, Richard B. Gilbert <rgilbert88@comcast.net> wrote:
> Carl Friedberg wrote:
> > It's been awhile, but IIRC, the BA356 is capable of operating in a split
> > bus mode, so that there are two independent SCSI buses. Assuming
> > two power supplies, that allows you to connect to two channels on a
> > SWXCR.
> >
>
> AFAIK two power supplies are not a requirement for split bus operation.
>   They are a very good thing to have however; those power supplies have
> been known to fail and it's nice to be able to swap out the bad supply
> without having your management know there was a problem (unless you
> choose to tell them).
>
>
>
>

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:14:47 -0400
From: "Richard B. Gilbert" <rgilbert88@comcast.net>
Subject: Re: ba356 box
Message-ID: <46FABDB7.2090903@comcast.net>

Carl Friedberg wrote:
> Richard,
> 
> You are quite correct, the flaw was in my message. I did not
> mean to imply that there was a requirement for dual power
> supplies, in order to split the bus. To split the bus, you
> need the BA356 manual, which IIRC shows how to flip
> over a couple of connectors on the BA356 backplane; then
> I believe the two SCSI connectors on the DWZZI?? will feed
> each half-bus separately. I know I've done it, but this was
> more than 10 years ago, so I don't trust my recollection.
> 
> I've never had a BA356 with only one power supply installed.
> I have had a BA356 with only one power supply working,
> and I never noticed that the other supply had died... doh...

I made it a practice to "walk the data center" every work day and just 
look at things.  VMS does not tell you about EVERY hardware problem and 
I picked up a couple of failed power supplies that way.  When I was 
managing Silicon Graphics workstations back in the late 80s and early 
90s, I made "fan rounds" every day.  The fans in those boxes were not 
what you'd call reliable!!  I kept a couple of spare fans on hand. . . .

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 23:43:59 GMT
From: Rob Brown <mylastname@gmcl.com>
Subject: Re: despair
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0709261740470.27191@localhost.localdomain>

On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Bob Koehler wrote:

>   Most of my friends were carrying around
>
>   "Waterloo FORTRAN with WATFOR and WATFIV"
>
>   I looked, but can't find the authors.

How about FORTRAN IV WITH WATFOR AND WATFIV by Cress / Dirksen / 
Graham.  I found it by searching Amazon.com.  I also have it in my 
basement someplace, but the www was easier.


-- 

Rob Brown                        b r o w n a t g m c l d o t c o m
G. Michaels Consulting Ltd.      (780)438-9343 (voice)
Edmonton                         (780)437-3367 (FAX)
                                  http://gmcl.com/

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:37:07 -0700
From:  nm0isn7e <CONNIE020044311106i0wh@gmail.com>
Subject: Serious Advertising for Serious Marketers
Message-ID: <1190835427.772700.131720@y42g2000hsy.googlegroups.com>

If you are in Need of a Fabulous, Turnkey Automated system then you
will want to look at CMS. The Best system on the net.

Follow This Link

http://www.mspsuccess.com/coach.html

Hurry Only 500 Available Worldwide

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:26:32 -0700
From:  ultradwc@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Soymail not working with WASD
Message-ID: <1190838392.313161.294640@n39g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>

On Sep 26, 1:40 pm, ultra...@gmail.com wrote:
> followed Alans book ... SSL webserver is running and serving
> static pages, but the moment the /soymail switch is added
> to the URL, only the soymail page under construction comes
> up ...
>
> clicking on /ht_root/src/soymail/ works
>
> but /cgi-bin/soymail/~ does not, gets err 404
>
> HTTPD$AUTH.CONF contains
>
> ["Default"=REALM]
> /cgi-bin/soymail/~* r+w
>
> HTTPD$MAP.CONF contains
>
> pass /soymail/-/* /ht_root/src/soymail/*
> set /cgi-bin/soymail/~* map=once
>
> the WASD server startup command is
>
> $ DEF/SYS HTTPD$SERVER "SYSUAF=SSL"
> $ @DSA0:[HT_ROOT.LOCAL]STARTUP WASD_SSL=1
>
> soymail.conf contains
>
> [private-access]
> username/*/USERNAME
>
> can the owner of soymail or anyone else familiar with
> WASD give some insight as to why following the book
> and docs failed and why a site under work page shows
> instead of authentication box then mail?
>
> PS  I can redirect purveyor to run the WASD built soymail
> .exe and it works, so the compile is fine ...

typo error on the above, the sysuaf=ssl has the / in front
of it ... so that is not the issue

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 22:27:32 -0000
From:  Pierre <pierre.bru@gmail.com>
Subject: username/nocom vs. sylogin
Message-ID: <1190845652.233821.237750@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>

from the top of my head, logging with username/nocom as username does
not prevent the sylogin to be executed. is this documented somewhere ?

TIA,
Pierre

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 16:09:02 -0700
From:  Bob Gezelter <gezelter@rlgsc.com>
Subject: Re: username/nocom vs. sylogin
Message-ID: <1190848142.829976.93930@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>

On Sep 26, 6:27 pm, Pierre <pierre....@gmail.com> wrote:
> from the top of my head, logging with username/nocom as username does
> not prevent the sylogin to be executed. is this documented somewhere ?
>
> TIA,
> Pierre

Pierre,

The /COMMAND switch is documented to "Controls the execution of your
default procedure when you log in" (per the HELP text). It says
nothing about the execution of the SYSTEM login procedure.

Allowing users to bypass the SYLOGIN at will would be a major security
hazard, as many sites use SYLOGIN to enforce supplemental security
provisions.

- Bob Gezelter, http://www.rlgsc.com

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:59:37 +0200
From: "P. Sture" <paul.sture.nospam@hispeed.ch>
Subject: Re: Web-based VMS Que Monitor for Deathrow
Message-ID: <paul.sture.nospam-2D4F6C.19593726092007@mac.sture.ch>

In article <MXIU3j7Pmozv@eisner.encompasserve.org>,
 burley.not-this@encompasserve-or-this.org (Graham Burley) wrote:

> In article <7arKi.10$fT2.4@newsfe12.lga>,   VAXman-  @SendSpamHere.ORG writes:
> 
> > Safari aborts after entering the Username and Password.
> 
> FWIW it works fine for me with Safari.

Which version of Safari?

-- 
Paul Sture

Sue's OpenVMS bookmarks:
http://eisner.encompasserve.org/~sture/ovms-bookmarks.html

------------------------------

Date: 26 Sep 2007 13:18:28 -0500
From: burley.not-this@encompasserve-or-this.org (Graham Burley)
Subject: Re: Web-based VMS Que Monitor for Deathrow
Message-ID: <c1sC5OpAYsdc@eisner.encompasserve.org>

In article <paul.sture.nospam-2D4F6C.19593726092007@mac.sture.ch>, "P. Sture" <paul.sture.nospam@hispeed.ch> writes:

> Which version of Safari?

Safari Version 2.0.4 (419.3)

Java Plug-in 1.5.0
Using JRE version 1.5.0_07 Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM

------------------------------

Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:48:38 GMT
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan-Erik_S=F6derholm?=
Subject: Re: Web-based VMS Que Monitor for Deathrow
Message-ID: <qIyKi.9782$ZA.5962@newsb.telia.net>

Graham Burley wrote:
> In article <paul.sture.nospam-2D4F6C.19593726092007@mac.sture.ch>, "P. Sture" <paul.sture.nospam@hispeed.ch> writes:
> 
>> Which version of Safari?
> 
> Safari Version 2.0.4 (419.3)
> 
> Java Plug-in 1.5.0
> Using JRE version 1.5.0_07 Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM
> 

I'm using Firefox but...
I had to update JRE from 1.5.0-something
to the latest 1.6.0 (1.6.0_02-b06) to get the page
working.

Jan-Erik.

------------------------------

Date: 26 Sep 2007 22:01:55 +0200
From: peter@langstoeger.at (Peter 'EPLAN' LANGSTOeGER)
Subject: Re: Web-based VMS Que Monitor for Deathrow
Message-ID: <46fad6d3$1@news.langstoeger.at>

In article <qIyKi.9782$ZA.5962@newsb.telia.net>, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jan-Erik_S=F6derholm?= <jan-erik.soderholm@telia.com> writes:
>I had to update JRE from 1.5.0-something
>to the latest 1.6.0 (1.6.0_02-b06) to get the page
>working.

Probably because 1.6 brought the authentication which seems required here.

We have a similar problem @work because there is still only 1.5.0 on OpenVMS
(and we have to enter authentication infos aka usernames/passwords twice)...

-- 
Peter "EPLAN" LANGSTOEGER
Network and OpenVMS system specialist
E-mail  peter@langstoeger.at
A-1030 VIENNA  AUSTRIA              I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist

------------------------------

End of INFO-VAX 2007.527
************************